NATR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Natures Sunshine Products's net margin of 13.42%. Natures Sunshine Products's return on equity of 10.74% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.17%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 369.48%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Natures Sunshine Products, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Natures Sunshine Products.

Natures Sunshine Products has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.53% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.134%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natures Sunshine Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natures Sunshine Products quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Natures Sunshine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Natures Sunshine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.22x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natures Sunshine Products is 0.62x versus 0.07x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Natures Sunshine Products's net margin of -4.54%. Natures Sunshine Products's return on equity of 10.74% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 2.78%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.17%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $36.85 which suggests that it could grow by 25.88%. Given that Natures Sunshine Products has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Natures Sunshine Products is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Natures Sunshine Products has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.53% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Natures Sunshine Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 68.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natures Sunshine Products quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Natures Sunshine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of -$290M. Notably, Natures Sunshine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.22x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natures Sunshine Products is 0.62x versus 1.37x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Natures Sunshine Products's net margin of -1.41%. Natures Sunshine Products's return on equity of 10.74% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.17%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 89.5%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Natures Sunshine Products, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Natures Sunshine Products.

Natures Sunshine Products has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.53% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natures Sunshine Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natures Sunshine Products quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Natures Sunshine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K. Notably, Natures Sunshine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.22x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natures Sunshine Products is 0.62x versus 1.63x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Natures Sunshine Products's net margin of 4.06%. Natures Sunshine Products's return on equity of 10.74% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 54.17%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $126.80 which suggests that it could grow by 17.54%. Given that Natures Sunshine Products has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Natures Sunshine Products is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Natures Sunshine Products has a beta of 0.965, which suggesting that the stock is 3.53% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.886%.

Natures Sunshine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natures Sunshine Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natures Sunshine Products quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Natures Sunshine Products's net income of $4.3M is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M. Notably, Natures Sunshine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.22x while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natures Sunshine Products is 0.62x versus 0.91x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.