LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -7.62%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4% beat Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -5.83%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 122.58%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Bridgford Foods.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.238, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.773%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues of $50.6M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K is higher than Bridgford Foods's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods's PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.42x versus 0.32x for Bridgford Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Better Choice has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 13.42%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 122.58%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1723.82%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.807%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.42x versus 0.02x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -34.48%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4% beat The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -30%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 122.58%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.28 which suggests that it could grow by 91.28%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.416%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues of $390.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K is higher than The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$134.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hain Celestial Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.42x versus 0.09x for The Hain Celestial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -3.52%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4% beat Healthy Choice Wellness's return on equity of -43.51%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 122.58%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 389.6%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness's net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.42x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.