LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 13.42%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.33%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 320.17%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.134%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.73x versus 0.08x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChromaDex has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 7.34%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat ChromaDex's return on equity of 4.96%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.33%. On the other hand ChromaDex has an analysts' consensus of $6.08 which suggests that it could grow by 47.96%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than ChromaDex, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than ChromaDex.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChromaDex has a beta of 2.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.901%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChromaDex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChromaDex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than ChromaDex quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is lower than ChromaDex's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ChromaDex's PE ratio is 548.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.73x versus 4.46x for ChromaDex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -4.54%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 2.78%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.33%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $37.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 68.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of -$290M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 27.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.73x versus 1.41x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lifevantage has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 3.87%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat Lifevantage's return on equity of 15.08%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.33%. On the other hand Lifevantage has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.32%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifevantage has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.93%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifevantage offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifevantage pays out 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than Lifevantage quarterly revenues of $47.2M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is lower than Lifevantage's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lifevantage's PE ratio is 52.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.73x versus 1.10x for Lifevantage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.