BRID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of -3.59% compared to Bridgford Foods's net margin of 13.42%. Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -0.79% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Bridgford Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 327.35%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Bridgford Foods.

Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 165.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.134%.

Bridgford Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgford Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Bridgford Foods's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Bridgford Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.73x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgford Foods is 0.42x versus 0.08x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group has a net margin of -3.59% compared to Bridgford Foods's net margin of -4.98%. Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -0.79% beat The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -8.73%.

Bridgford Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.64 which suggests that it could grow by 76.47%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods, analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group is more attractive than Bridgford Foods.

Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 165.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.196%.

Bridgford Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgford Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues of $394.6M. Bridgford Foods's net income of -$1.8M is higher than The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$19.7M. Notably, Bridgford Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.73x while The Hain Celestial Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgford Foods is 0.42x versus 0.29x for The Hain Celestial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness has a net margin of -3.59% compared to Bridgford Foods's net margin of -14.58%. Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -0.79% beat Healthy Choice Wellness's return on equity of -80.93%.

Bridgford Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridgford Foods has higher upside potential than Healthy Choice Wellness, analysts believe Bridgford Foods is more attractive than Healthy Choice Wellness.

Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 165.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridgford Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgford Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than Healthy Choice Wellness quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Bridgford Foods's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Bridgford Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.73x while Healthy Choice Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgford Foods is 0.42x versus 0.19x for Healthy Choice Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of -3.59% compared to Bridgford Foods's net margin of -1.41%. Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -0.79% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88%.

Bridgford Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.15%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Bridgford Foods.

Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 165.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridgford Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bridgford Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues are $49.3M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Bridgford Foods's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K. Notably, Bridgford Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.73x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridgford Foods is 0.42x versus 1.75x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.