POST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 11.87%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.28, signalling upside risk potential of 12.99%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.13%. Given that Post Holdings has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Post Holdings is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.853%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 1.35x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -3.43%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.28, signalling upside risk potential of 12.99%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 98.78%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 1.50x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 4.32%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.28, signalling upside risk potential of 12.99%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.63 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that Post Holdings has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe Post Holdings is more attractive than Mondelez International.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.496, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.422%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 25.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 2.47x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Simply Good Foods has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 10.22%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.28, signalling upside risk potential of 12.99%. On the other hand The Simply Good Foods has an analysts' consensus of $41.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.98%. Given that The Simply Good Foods has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Simply Good Foods is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Simply Good Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Simply Good Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues of $359.7M. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is higher than The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while The Simply Good Foods's PE ratio is 25.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 2.60x for The Simply Good Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.