POST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 3.21% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 13.42%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.03% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.64, signalling upside risk potential of 12.47%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1618.8%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.807%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Post Holdings's net income of $62.6M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 0.02x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 3.21% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 11.87%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.03% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.64, signalling upside risk potential of 12.47%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.32 which suggests that it could grow by 21.45%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.273%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Post Holdings's net income of $62.6M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 11.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 1.23x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 3.21% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -1.34%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.03% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.64, signalling upside risk potential of 12.47%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 119.09%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Post Holdings's net income of $62.6M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 1.44x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Simply Good Foods has a net margin of 3.21% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 10.22%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.03% beat The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $127.64, signalling upside risk potential of 12.47%. On the other hand The Simply Good Foods has an analysts' consensus of $41.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that The Simply Good Foods has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Simply Good Foods is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.493, which suggesting that the stock is 50.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.049%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Simply Good Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Simply Good Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues of $359.7M. Post Holdings's net income of $62.6M is higher than The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.19x while The Simply Good Foods's PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.94x versus 2.37x for The Simply Good Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.