GREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bit Digital has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -229.88%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Bit Digital's return on equity of -22.63%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand Bit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Bit Digital, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Bit Digital.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.385, which suggesting that the stock is 238.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Digital has a beta of 5.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 436.333%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than Bit Digital quarterly revenues of $25.1M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than Bit Digital's net income of -$57.7M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bit Digital's PE ratio is 8.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.27x versus 2.35x for Bit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -249.29%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.27 which suggests that it could grow by 43.55%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.385, which suggesting that the stock is 238.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 561.113%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.27x versus 6.59x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 90.83%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.385, which suggesting that the stock is 238.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.27x versus 5.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -28.92% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -178.52%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -42.95%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $6.64 which suggests that it could grow by 88.59%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.385, which suggesting that the stock is 238.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 3.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 208.421%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.2M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $34.4M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$5.6M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$61.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.27x versus 9.98x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.