WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bit Digital has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 35.41%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Bit Digital's return on equity of 9.49%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 251.23%. On the other hand Bit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 252.6%. Given that Bit Digital has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Bit Digital is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, which suggesting that the stock is 176.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Digital has a beta of 6.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 505.209%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Bit Digital quarterly revenues of $81.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Bit Digital's net income of $29M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bit Digital's PE ratio is 6.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 5.60x versus 1.50x for Bit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -51.55%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of --.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 251.23%. On the other hand Greenidge Generation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 567.78%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, which suggesting that the stock is 176.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 3.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.86%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenidge Generation Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues of $12.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenidge Generation Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 5.60x versus 0.11x for Greenidge Generation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -94.79%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 251.23%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.04 which suggests that it could grow by 87.75%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, which suggesting that the stock is 176.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 509.761%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 5.60x versus 5.55x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 95.71%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $7.85, signalling upside risk potential of 251.23%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.43 which suggests that it could grow by 142.02%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, which suggesting that the stock is 176.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 5.60x versus 5.22x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.