BGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 4.5% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 32.18%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.73% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 73.3%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $234.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.05%. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.367% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. BGC Group pays 26.9% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $560M, which are larger than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.4M. BGC Group's net income of $25.2M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.69x versus 9.82x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 4.5% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 95.71%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.73% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 73.3%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.77 which suggests that it could grow by 134.83%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.367% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 26.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $560M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. BGC Group's net income of $25.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 20.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.69x versus 5.49x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of 4.5% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 17.53%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.73% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 73.3%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.367% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.738%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 26.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $560M, which are larger than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. BGC Group's net income of $25.2M is higher than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.69x versus 1.33x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of 4.5% compared to BGC Group's net margin of -83.45%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.73% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 73.3%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.06 which suggests that it could grow by 241.72%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.134, which suggesting that the stock is 13.367% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.172%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 26.9% of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $560M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $35M. BGC Group's net income of $25.2M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.96x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.69x versus 6.64x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.