MARA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -94.79% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of -69.65%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.04, signalling upside risk potential of 77.47%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 140.03%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, which suggesting that the stock is 509.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 312.638%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $214.4M, which are larger than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $162.3M. MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M is higher than Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 72.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 5.87x versus 4.22x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -94.79% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of 56.84%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.04, signalling upside risk potential of 77.47%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $314.12 which suggests that it could grow by 71.7%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, which suggesting that the stock is 509.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $214.4M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 19.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 5.87x versus 7.52x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -94.79% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of 44.79%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 53.1%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.04, signalling upside risk potential of 77.47%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $30.20 which suggests that it could grow by 125.54%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, which suggesting that the stock is 509.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 284.96%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $214.4M, which are smaller than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $339.9M. MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M is higher than Hut 8's net income of $152.2M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 3.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 5.87x versus 1.95x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -94.79% compared to MARA Holdings's net margin of 95.71%. MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

MARA Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.04, signalling upside risk potential of 77.47%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.97 which suggests that it could grow by 111.56%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.098, which suggesting that the stock is 509.761% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

MARA Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MARA Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MARA Holdings quarterly revenues are $214.4M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, MARA Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 23.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MARA Holdings is 5.87x versus 6.16x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.