FTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 28.15% compared to Fortinet's net margin of -9.99%. Fortinet's return on equity of 208.09% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $108.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.62%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $472.83 which suggests that it could fall by -1.62%. Given that Fortinet has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Fortinet is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.225%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fortinet's net income of $433.4M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.49x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.70x versus 28.82x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 28.15% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 36.86%. Fortinet's return on equity of 208.09% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $108.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.62%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $513.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.08%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Fortinet's net income of $433.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.49x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.70x versus 13.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of 28.15% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 9.01%. Fortinet's return on equity of 208.09% beat Okta's return on equity of 2.08%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $108.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.62%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $123.32 which suggests that it could grow by 26.51%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.946%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $688M. Fortinet's net income of $433.4M is higher than Okta's net income of $62M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.49x while Okta's PE ratio is 154.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.70x versus 6.53x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 28.15% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 11.45%. Fortinet's return on equity of 208.09% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $108.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.62%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.74 which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.047%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Fortinet's net income of $433.4M is higher than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.49x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 112.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.70x versus 15.67x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.