FTEK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of -35.64% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 3.08%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.35%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 325.31%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.80 which suggests that it could grow by 80.72%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.112, which suggesting that the stock is 311.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.512%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 56.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.15x versus 1.29x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -35.64% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 11.02%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 325.31%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 21.36%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Donaldson.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.112, which suggesting that the stock is 311.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.228%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 17.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.15x versus 2.05x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of -35.64% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of --. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 325.31%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14900%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.112, which suggesting that the stock is 311.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.894%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.15x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -35.64% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 6.85%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 325.31%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.4%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.112, which suggesting that the stock is 311.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.92000000000001%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $143.7M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.15x versus 1.60x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.