FTEK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 20.37%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.64%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 23.19%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, which suggesting that the stock is 348.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.645%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 21.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 2.18x versus 1.67x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 6.15%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 24.08%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.64%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $71.60 which suggests that it could grow by 2.84%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Donaldson.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, which suggesting that the stock is 348.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.408%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $940.1M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than Donaldson's net income of $57.8M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 2.18x versus 2.32x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of --. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.64%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12400%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, which suggesting that the stock is 348.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.455%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 2.18x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 7.67%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 111.64%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.25 which suggests that it could fall by -9.58%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, which suggesting that the stock is 348.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.637%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $6.4M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 50.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 2.18x versus 3.20x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.