CECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 1.54% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of 11%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 29.12%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.52%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Donaldson.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.206%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $900.1M. CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $99M. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.30x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.93x versus 2.29x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 1.54% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of 1.02%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 273.83%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 309.928%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $7.9M. CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of $80K. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.30x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.93x versus 1.25x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of 1.54% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of --. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6150%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.431%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.30x while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.93x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 1.54% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of 5.59%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.56%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, which suggesting that the stock is 40.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.932%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.9M. CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 89.30x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 39.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.93x versus 2.00x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.