AAON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 11.02%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.74%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.1%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Donaldson.

AAON has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.364% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.228%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.15x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.77x versus 2.30x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of -35.64%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.74%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 300%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.364% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 311.242%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $5.3M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.15x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.77x versus 1.22x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 14.7%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.74%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $607.65 which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Lennox International.

AAON has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.364% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.332%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AAON's net income of $24.7M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $197.7M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.15x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.77x versus 3.85x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 8.29% compared to AAON's net margin of 6.85%. AAON's return on equity of 21.71% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $109.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.74%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.96%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.364% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.92000000000001%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.41%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $297.7M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $143.7M. AAON's net income of $24.7M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.15x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 29.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 5.77x versus 1.77x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.