AAON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 11.02%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $111.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $71.83 which suggests that it could grow by 2.14%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Donaldson.

AAON has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66900000000001%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.73x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 6.64x versus 2.37x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of -11.58%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $111.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 161.44%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 338.367%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.73x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 6.64x versus 1.77x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 11.22%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $111.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $558.61 which suggests that it could fall by -3.56%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Lennox International.

AAON has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.168%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. AAON's net income of $29.3M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.73x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 6.64x versus 3.86x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 7.67%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $111.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $125.50 which suggests that it could fall by -6.9%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

AAON has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.953%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.73x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 48.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 6.64x versus 3.05x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.