LII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 1.54%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.77%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.912%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $135.5M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.44x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 89.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.32x versus 1.93x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 11%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 29.12%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.52%. Given that Donaldson has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Donaldson is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.206%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $900.1M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than Donaldson's net income of $99M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.44x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.32x versus 2.29x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 1.02%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 273.83%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 309.928%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of $80K. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.44x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.32x versus 1.25x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 5.59%. Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.56%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.932%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.9M. Lennox International's net income of $239M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.44x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 39.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 4.32x versus 2.00x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.