IR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 21.56%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 7.34%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $108.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $140.37 which suggests that it could grow by 11.21%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.059%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $996M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 36.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 5.26x versus 4.14x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 14.24%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $108.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $741.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.61%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.595%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 29.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 5.26x versus 4.26x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 14.19%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 35.05%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $108.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.13%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Trane Technologies PLC, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Trane Technologies PLC.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.213%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $772M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 35.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 5.26x versus 4.49x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 12.71%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $108.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.92% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.569%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M is higher than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 24.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 5.26x versus 3.04x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.