WTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Recovery has a net margin of 12.51% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 34.99%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03% beat Energy Recovery's return on equity of 10.49%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $218.67, signalling upside risk potential of 1.74%. On the other hand Energy Recovery has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Energy Recovery has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Energy Recovery is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Recovery has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.052%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Energy Recovery offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Recovery pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than Energy Recovery quarterly revenues of $67.1M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M is higher than Energy Recovery's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.73x while Energy Recovery's PE ratio is 38.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.20x versus 6.32x for Energy Recovery. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 12.51% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 10.86%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.06%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $218.67, signalling upside risk potential of 1.74%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $91.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.29%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.824%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $186.5M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.73x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 37.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.20x versus 4.29x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 12.51% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 11.6%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $218.67, signalling upside risk potential of 1.74%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.35%. Given that Mueller Water Products has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Mueller Water Products is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.304%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.73x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 31.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.20x versus 3.14x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tennant has a net margin of 12.51% compared to Watts Water Technologies's net margin of 4.52%. Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03% beat Tennant's return on equity of 10.9%.

Watts Water Technologies has a consensus price target of $218.67, signalling upside risk potential of 1.74%. On the other hand Tennant has an analysts' consensus of $129.33 which suggests that it could grow by 80.94%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 1.081, which suggesting that the stock is 8.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tennant has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.838%.

Watts Water Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Tennant offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Watts Water Technologies pays 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant pays out 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than Tennant quarterly revenues of $290M. Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M is higher than Tennant's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Watts Water Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.73x while Tennant's PE ratio is 19.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Watts Water Technologies is 3.20x versus 1.08x for Tennant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.