TNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Tennant's net margin of 7.56%. Tennant's return on equity of 17.93% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.46%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $277.35 which suggests that it could grow by 30.6%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

Tennant has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.236%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Tennant pays 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $315.8M, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Tennant's net income of $20.8M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 33.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.21x versus 1.91x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Tennant's net margin of 2.87%. Tennant's return on equity of 17.93% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 15.25%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.46%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Tennant has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.202%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Tennant pays 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $315.8M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $348.2M. Tennant's net income of $20.8M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $10M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 30.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.21x versus 2.70x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standex International has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Tennant's net margin of 10.68%. Tennant's return on equity of 17.93% beat Standex International's return on equity of 11.64%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.46%. On the other hand Standex International has an analysts' consensus of $217.90 which suggests that it could grow by 15.15%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Standex International, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Standex International.

Tennant has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standex International has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.835%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Standex International offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Tennant pays 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Standex International pays out 19.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $315.8M, which are larger than Standex International quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Tennant's net income of $20.8M is higher than Standex International's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while Standex International's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.21x versus 3.19x for Standex International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Tennant's net margin of 10.31%. Tennant's return on equity of 17.93% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $128.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.46%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.68%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Xylem.

Tennant has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Tennant pays 18.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $315.8M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Tennant's net income of $20.8M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.21x versus 3.39x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.