CAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of -73.53% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -23.48%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $113.50, signalling upside risk potential of 95.66%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could fall by -2.5%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.373, which suggesting that the stock is 137.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$2B is lower than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.18x versus 0.12x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -73.53% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 4.21%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.89%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $113.50, signalling upside risk potential of 95.66%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $174.22 which suggests that it could grow by 24.88%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than Ryder System.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.373, which suggesting that the stock is 137.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.938%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$2B is lower than Ryder System's net income of $135M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.18x versus 0.49x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -73.53% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 4.84%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $113.50, signalling upside risk potential of 95.66%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $91.40 which suggests that it could grow by 41.26%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than U-Haul Holding, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than U-Haul Holding.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.373, which suggesting that the stock is 137.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.054%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$2B is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 30.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.18x versus 2.21x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of -73.53% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 3.9%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat XPO's return on equity of 26.37%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $113.50, signalling upside risk potential of 95.66%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $150.62 which suggests that it could grow by 40.45%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than XPO, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than XPO.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.373, which suggesting that the stock is 137.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 2.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.109%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than XPO quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$2B is lower than XPO's net income of $75M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while XPO's PE ratio is 33.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.18x versus 1.59x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.