DWAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of -24.44%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -291.93%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.81 which suggests that it could fall by -34.58%. Given that Hertz Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Hertz Global Holdings is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.886, which suggesting that the stock is 788.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$443M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 19.03x versus 0.20x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McGrath RentCorp has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of 14.44%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat McGrath RentCorp's return on equity of 22.58%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McGrath RentCorp has an analysts' consensus of $144.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.98%. Given that McGrath RentCorp has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe McGrath RentCorp is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.886, which suggesting that the stock is 788.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McGrath RentCorp has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.385%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McGrath RentCorp offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp pays out 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than McGrath RentCorp quarterly revenues of $195.4M. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is lower than McGrath RentCorp's net income of $28.2M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McGrath RentCorp's PE ratio is 11.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 19.03x versus 3.01x for McGrath RentCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of 3.12%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $165.56 which suggests that it could grow by 9.89%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.886, which suggesting that the stock is 788.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.406%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.1B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is lower than Ryder System's net income of $98M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryder System's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 19.03x versus 0.52x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of -6.67%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $89.84 which suggests that it could grow by 42.58%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.886, which suggesting that the stock is 788.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.163%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.2B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is higher than U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 37.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 19.03x versus 2.12x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.