UHAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of 4.84% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -479.76%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $91.40, signalling upside risk potential of 39.74%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 736.93%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.4K. U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M is higher than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$529.7K. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.24x versus 7.24x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H&E Equipment Services has a net margin of 4.84% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 8.53%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1% beat H&E Equipment Services's return on equity of 21.35%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $91.40, signalling upside risk potential of 39.74%. On the other hand H&E Equipment Services has an analysts' consensus of $85.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.93%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than H&E Equipment Services, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than H&E Equipment Services.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 1.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.651%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H&E Equipment Services offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services pays out 32.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than H&E Equipment Services quarterly revenues of $384.1M. U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M is higher than H&E Equipment Services's net income of $32.8M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while H&E Equipment Services's PE ratio is 28.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.24x versus 2.30x for H&E Equipment Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of 4.84% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -23.48%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1% beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -164.56%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $91.40, signalling upside risk potential of 39.74%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could fall by -18.44%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$479M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.24x versus 0.14x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of 4.84% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 4.21%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1% beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.89%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $91.40, signalling upside risk potential of 39.74%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $174.22 which suggests that it could grow by 24%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Ryder System.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.938%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M is lower than Ryder System's net income of $135M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 12.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.24x versus 0.49x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.