AQMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of -20.76%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 994.89%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of 16.91%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.76%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 994.89%. On the other hand Mueller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.98%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than Mueller Industries, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than Mueller Industries.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.174%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Industries offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mueller Industries quarterly revenues of $997.8M. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Mueller Industries's net income of $168.7M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mueller Industries's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 2.57x for Mueller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of --. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of --.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 994.89%. On the other hand Nano Nuclear Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 78.13%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Nuclear Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Nuclear Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues of --. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nano Nuclear Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus -- for Nano Nuclear Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -- compared to Aqua Metals's net margin of -3675.58%. Aqua Metals's return on equity of -- beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73%.

Aqua Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 994.89%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $18.42 which suggests that it could fall by -22.16%. Given that Aqua Metals has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Aqua Metals is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.179% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aqua Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aqua Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aqua Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $475K. Aqua Metals's net income of -$5.2M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Aqua Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aqua Metals is -- versus 273.41x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.