SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NAPC Defense has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -646.04%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat NAPC Defense's return on equity of --.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.8%. On the other hand NAPC Defense has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than NAPC Defense, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than NAPC Defense.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.632% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPC Defense has a beta of 3.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 242.842%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. NAPC Defense offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPC Defense pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than NAPC Defense quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is higher than NAPC Defense's net income of -$435.9K. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while NAPC Defense's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus -- for NAPC Defense. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -82.25%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.8%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.632% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 18.56%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.8%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.632% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.492%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is lower than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 23.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 4.18x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 4.26%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat VSE's return on equity of 2.03%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.8%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $135.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.21%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than VSE.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.632% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.289%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. VSE offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are smaller than VSE quarterly revenues of $273.6M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is lower than VSE's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.78x while VSE's PE ratio is 124.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 1.63x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.