SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NAPC Defense has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -646.04%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat NAPC Defense's return on equity of --.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand NAPC Defense has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than NAPC Defense, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than NAPC Defense.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPC Defense has a beta of 4.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 303.507%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. NAPC Defense offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPC Defense pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than NAPC Defense quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is higher than NAPC Defense's net income of -$639.2K. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while NAPC Defense's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.96x versus -- for NAPC Defense. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -16.81%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11692573.72%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 353.454%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.96x versus 0.10x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 15.29%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.731%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is lower than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 18.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.96x versus 3.17x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 1.44% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 5.72%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $13.83, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.19%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.076%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $115.9M, which are smaller than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M is lower than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.17x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.96x versus 1.20x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.