WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mattel has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 20.2%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $113.03, signalling downside risk potential of -13.06%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.01 which suggests that it could grow by 33.9%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.641%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.41x versus 1.16x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.61%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $113.03, signalling downside risk potential of -13.06%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.53 which suggests that it could fall by -28.6%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Whirlpool, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.41x versus 15.32x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.86%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 65.49%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $113.03, signalling downside risk potential of -13.06%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $20.07 which suggests that it could grow by 37.47%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.919%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 6.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 102.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $566.7M. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is higher than The Wendy's's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.41x versus 1.36x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 5.36%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 19.94% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $113.03, signalling downside risk potential of -13.06%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $25.44 which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.326%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Whirlpool pays 79.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Whirlpool's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Whirlpool's net income of $109M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.82x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.41x versus 1.02x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.