TXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of -0.19%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Textron has a consensus price target of $84.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.76%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $200.28 which suggests that it could fall by -2.17%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Boeing.

Textron has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.611%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Textron's net income of $207M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.02x versus 2.01x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 8.13%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $84.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.76%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $292.42 which suggests that it could grow by 8.03%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Textron has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.852%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.02x versus 1.53x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 9.53%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $84.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.76%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.23 which suggests that it could grow by 16.71%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Textron.

Textron has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.02x versus 1.49x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 22.28%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Textron has a consensus price target of $84.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.76%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,521.32 which suggests that it could grow by 9.35%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Textron has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.586%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $479M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.02x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 46.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.02x versus 9.62x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.