SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 5.45%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $244.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.92%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.384%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is lower than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.08x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 16.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.65x versus 0.80x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 6.47%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $21.69 which suggests that it could fall by -0.93%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.801%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.08x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.65x versus 0.86x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.85%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.65%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.422%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.08x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 62.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.65x versus 1.87x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 7.56%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $84.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $142.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.19%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than RTX.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.116%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.03%. RTX offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.08x while RTX's PE ratio is 42.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.65x versus 2.40x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.