RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of 0.75%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 11.15%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $5.15, signalling upside risk potential of 26.76%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Gran Tierra Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Gran Tierra Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.735, which suggesting that the stock is 173.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.336%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $151.4M. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 5.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 1.08x versus 0.37x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of -111.16%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $5.15, signalling upside risk potential of 26.76%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.735, which suggesting that the stock is 173.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.45%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 1.08x versus 28.44x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of -470.52%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $5.15, signalling upside risk potential of 26.76%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.735, which suggesting that the stock is 173.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.446, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.577%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9K. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Leopard Energy's net income of -$9.1K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 1.08x versus -- for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of -52.11% compared to Transocean's net margin of 9.04%. Transocean's return on equity of -5.97% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $5.15, signalling upside risk potential of 26.76%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $54.78 which suggests that it could grow by 46%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Transocean, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Transocean.

Transocean has a beta of 2.735, which suggesting that the stock is 173.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $948M, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $354M. Transocean's net income of -$494M is lower than Seadrill's net income of $32M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seadrill's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 1.08x versus 1.83x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.