SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coterra Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.54%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 9.54%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.03 which suggests that it could grow by 34.04%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Coterra Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Coterra Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.457%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 54.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $252M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.28x while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.79x versus 3.27x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 9.43%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.59%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than SM Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.28x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.79x versus 1.90x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of -6.47%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 12.01%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Gulfport Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.71 which suggests that it could grow by 12.27%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Gulfport Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Gulfport Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Gulfport Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulfport Energy pays out 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues of $215.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Gulfport Energy's net income of -$14M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.28x while Gulfport Energy's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.79x versus 3.45x for Gulfport Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 57.9%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 35.38%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.28x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.79x versus 1.69x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.