SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archrock has a net margin of 22.53% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.31%. SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8% beat Archrock's return on equity of 16.37%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.58%. On the other hand Archrock has an analysts' consensus of $31.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Archrock.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archrock has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.386%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Archrock offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock pays out 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $835.9M, which are larger than Archrock quarterly revenues of $326.4M. SM Energy's net income of $188.3M is higher than Archrock's net income of $59.8M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.53x while Archrock's PE ratio is 25.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.31x versus 3.73x for Archrock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 22.53% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 29.06%. SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.58%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $204.31 which suggests that it could grow by 27.51%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.902%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $835.9M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. SM Energy's net income of $188.3M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.53x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.31x versus 3.10x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 22.53% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 14.22%. SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.58%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $41.18 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.797, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.708%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $835.9M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $667M. SM Energy's net income of $188.3M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $94.8M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.53x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 35.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.31x versus 4.01x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 22.53% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 9.39%. SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $47.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.58%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $128.98 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $835.9M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. SM Energy's net income of $188.3M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.53x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 15.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.31x versus 1.50x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.