PX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 6.68% compared to P10's net margin of 1.3%. P10's return on equity of 4.66% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling upside risk potential of 34.28%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.58%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.088%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $67.7M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. P10's net income of $4.5M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.33x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.59x versus 1.16x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 6.68% compared to P10's net margin of -14.33%. P10's return on equity of 4.66% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling upside risk potential of 34.28%. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 846.37%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than P10, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than P10.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.963%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. P10's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $67.7M, which are smaller than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. P10's net income of $4.5M is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.33x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.59x versus 0.06x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 6.68% compared to P10's net margin of 27.48%. P10's return on equity of 4.66% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling upside risk potential of 34.28%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.20 which suggests that it could fall by -0.9%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than SEI Investments.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.563%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $67.7M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. P10's net income of $4.5M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.33x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 18.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.59x versus 5.20x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 6.68% compared to P10's net margin of 27.81%. P10's return on equity of 4.66% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.38, signalling upside risk potential of 34.28%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.62 which suggests that it could fall by -2.04%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.998%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $67.7M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. P10's net income of $4.5M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.33x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.59x versus 3.00x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.