How High Will Bloom Energy Stock Go?
Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) has seen its shares surge by more…
Sell
43
GROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.20
Seasonality move
:
0.1%
Day range:
$2.13 - $2.18
52-week range:
$2.02 - $2.73
Dividend yield:
4.21%
P/E ratio:
79.78x
P/S ratio:
3.24x
P/B ratio:
0.62x
Volume:
56.3K
Avg. volume:
25.1K
1-year change:
-19.25%
Market cap:
$28.6M
Revenue:
$11M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROW
US Global Investors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MARA
MARA Holdings
|
$217.6M | $0.72 | 41.32% | -43.1% | $19.88 |
|
PFG
Principal Financial Group
|
$4B | $1.83 | -6.77% | 35.26% | $81.00 |
|
RILY
B. Riley Financial
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEIC
SEI Investments
|
$550.4M | $1.14 | 6.12% | 8.95% | $85.20 |
|
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
|
$1.8B | $2.13 | -1.02% | -5.86% | $93.46 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROW
US Global Investors
|
$2.14 | -- | $28.6M | 79.78x | $0.01 | 4.21% | 3.24x |
|
MARA
MARA Holdings
|
$15.87 | $19.88 | $5.6B | 10.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.41x |
|
PFG
Principal Financial Group
|
$81.04 | $81.00 | $18.2B | 17.54x | $0.75 | 3.59% | 1.19x |
|
RILY
B. Riley Financial
|
$3.30 | -- | $100.6M | -- | $0.50 | 90.91% | 0.07x |
|
SEIC
SEI Investments
|
$83.37 | $85.20 | $10.4B | 18.12x | $0.49 | 1.14% | 5.04x |
|
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
|
$97.32 | $93.46 | $21.4B | 11.03x | $1.27 | 5.13% | 3.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROW
US Global Investors
|
-- | 0.436 | -- | 20.78x |
|
MARA
MARA Holdings
|
41.1% | 5.499 | 65.19% | 0.56x |
|
PFG
Principal Financial Group
|
27.95% | 1.055 | 22.47% | 2.92x |
|
RILY
B. Riley Financial
|
90.54% | -0.162 | 311.21% | 3.05x |
|
SEIC
SEI Investments
|
-- | 0.695 | 0.02% | 5.33x |
|
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
|
-- | 1.843 | -- | 5.87x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROW
US Global Investors
|
$813K | -$893K | 0.34% | 0.34% | -11.65% | -$424K |
|
MARA
MARA Holdings
|
$170.4M | -$173.7M | -7.43% | -10.39% | -300.48% | -$254.3M |
|
PFG
Principal Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 6.97% | 9.43% | 0.78% | $960.9M |
|
RILY
B. Riley Financial
|
$206.9M | -$2.6M | -5.96% | -37.71% | -5.88% | $134.4M |
|
SEIC
SEI Investments
|
$303.9M | $157.1M | 26.44% | 26.44% | 35.65% | $130.5M |
|
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
|
$922M | $625M | 18.11% | 18.11% | 35.43% | $550.9M |
US Global Investors vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GROW or MARA?
MARA Holdings has a net margin of -18.17% compared to US Global Investors's net margin of -249.29%. US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GROWUS Global Investors38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M MARAMARA Holdings79.67% -$1.55 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GROW or MARA?
US Global Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.88 which suggests that it could grow by 25.3%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than US Global Investors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GROWUS Global Investors0 0 0 MARAMARA Holdings4 8 1 -
Is GROW or MARA More Risky?
US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GROW or MARA?
US Global Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. US Global Investors pays 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GROW or MARA?
US Global Investors quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. US Global Investors's net income of -$382K is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, US Global Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.78x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Global Investors is 3.24x versus 7.41x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GROWUS Global Investors3.24x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K MARAMARA Holdings7.41x 10.51x $213.9M -$533.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns GROW or PFG?
Principal Financial Group has a net margin of -18.17% compared to US Global Investors's net margin of 1.3%. US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GROWUS Global Investors38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M PFGPrincipal Financial Group-- $0.21 $15.9B -
What do Analysts Say About GROW or PFG?
US Global Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.05%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GROWUS Global Investors0 0 0 PFGPrincipal Financial Group1 6 2 -
Is GROW or PFG More Risky?
US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.088%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GROW or PFG?
US Global Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. US Global Investors pays 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GROW or PFG?
US Global Investors quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. US Global Investors's net income of -$382K is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, US Global Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.78x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Global Investors is 3.24x versus 1.19x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GROWUS Global Investors3.24x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K PFGPrincipal Financial Group1.19x 17.54x $3.7B $48.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GROW or RILY?
B. Riley Financial has a net margin of -18.17% compared to US Global Investors's net margin of -14.33%. US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GROWUS Global Investors38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M RILYB. Riley Financial60.32% -$1.71 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About GROW or RILY?
US Global Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 809.09%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than US Global Investors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GROWUS Global Investors0 0 0 RILYB. Riley Financial0 0 0 -
Is GROW or RILY More Risky?
US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.963%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GROW or RILY?
US Global Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 90.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. US Global Investors pays 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GROW or RILY?
US Global Investors quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are smaller than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. US Global Investors's net income of -$382K is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, US Global Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.78x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Global Investors is 3.24x versus 0.07x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GROWUS Global Investors3.24x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K RILYB. Riley Financial0.07x -- $343M -$49.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns GROW or SEIC?
SEI Investments has a net margin of -18.17% compared to US Global Investors's net margin of 27.48%. US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GROWUS Global Investors38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M SEICSEI Investments55.13% $1.17 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GROW or SEIC?
US Global Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.20 which suggests that it could grow by 2.2%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than US Global Investors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GROWUS Global Investors0 0 0 SEICSEI Investments2 4 0 -
Is GROW or SEIC More Risky?
US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GROW or SEIC?
US Global Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. US Global Investors pays 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GROW or SEIC?
US Global Investors quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. US Global Investors's net income of -$382K is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, US Global Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.78x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 18.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Global Investors is 3.24x versus 5.04x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GROWUS Global Investors3.24x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K SEICSEI Investments5.04x 18.12x $551.3M $151.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns GROW or TROW?
T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of -18.17% compared to US Global Investors's net margin of 27.81%. US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GROWUS Global Investors38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M TROWT. Rowe Price Group52.27% $2.15 $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About GROW or TROW?
US Global Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.46 which suggests that it could fall by -3.97%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GROWUS Global Investors0 0 0 TROWT. Rowe Price Group0 9 0 -
Is GROW or TROW More Risky?
US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.998%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GROW or TROW?
US Global Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. US Global Investors pays 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GROW or TROW?
US Global Investors quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. US Global Investors's net income of -$382K is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, US Global Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.78x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for US Global Investors is 3.24x versus 3.05x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GROWUS Global Investors3.24x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K TROWT. Rowe Price Group3.05x 11.03x $1.8B $490.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Acuity a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) is an industrial company specializing in lighting.…
What Stocks Are Recession-Proof?
Fears of a recession prevailed in Q2 2025 when the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
74
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
71
NUTX alert for May 15
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 9.76% over the past day.
Buy
81
EXEL alert for May 15
Exelixis [EXEL] is up 3.67% over the past day.
Sell
29
GLBE alert for May 15
Global E Online [GLBE] is down 3.44% over the past day.
