PFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 19.05% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of -3.86%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 1.04%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $87.62, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.802, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.201%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$86K. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 83.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.21x versus 3.38x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 19.05% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of -94.79%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $87.62, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.04 which suggests that it could grow by 78.04%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 495.066%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 9.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.21x versus 5.85x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 19.05% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of 27.96%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 25.84%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $87.62, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.01%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.843%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $557.2M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M is higher than SEI Investments's net income of $155.8M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.21x versus 4.70x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 19.05% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of 24.11%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $87.62, signalling upside risk potential of 5.23%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $110.54 which suggests that it could grow by 19.08%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.174, which suggesting that the stock is 17.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.464%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M is higher than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.21x versus 2.92x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.