Financhill
Buy
58

PWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$263.53
Seasonality move :
16.43%
Day range:
$258.12 - $270.57
52-week range:
$227.11 - $365.88
Dividend yield:
0.14%
P/E ratio:
44.34x
P/S ratio:
1.69x
P/B ratio:
5.42x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
10.15%
Market cap:
$39.6B
Revenue:
$23.7B
EPS (TTM):
$6.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PWR
Quanta Services
$6.6B $2.62 16.85% 122.06% $337.40
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$674.9M $0.69 -3.84% -43.76% $61.67
EME
EMCOR Group
$3.8B $5.76 9.92% 11.99% $499.80
FAST
Fastenal
$1.8B $0.48 2.48% -1.14% $75.63
IESC
IES Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PWR
Quanta Services
$267.40 $337.40 $39.6B 44.34x $0.10 0.14% 1.69x
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$38.98 $61.67 $2B 13.12x $0.00 0% 0.70x
EME
EMCOR Group
$395.09 $499.80 $18B 18.34x $0.25 0.25% 1.27x
FAST
Fastenal
$76.07 $75.63 $43.6B 37.85x $0.43 2.1% 5.79x
IESC
IES Holdings
$186.21 -- $3.7B 17.34x $0.00 0% 1.26x
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
$0.0059 -- $820.3K -- $0.00 0% 0.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PWR
Quanta Services
36.26% 1.598 8.92% 1.18x
ECG
Everus Construction Group
41.16% 0.000 8.82% 1.64x
EME
EMCOR Group
-- 1.549 -- 1.25x
FAST
Fastenal
5.24% 1.023 0.49% 1.99x
IESC
IES Holdings
-- 3.653 -- 1.43x
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -0.943 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PWR
Quanta Services
$1.1B $441.4M 8.39% 13.45% 7.21% $565M
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$86.3M $46M 22.15% 35.18% 6.21% $48.2M
EME
EMCOR Group
$757M $388.6M 37.22% 37.22% 11.27% $451.8M
FAST
Fastenal
$818.2M $344.8M 30.89% 32.9% 18.96% $222.6M
IESC
IES Holdings
$178M $75M 37.95% 37.95% 10.42% $24.1M
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -- -- -- -- --

Quanta Services vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or ECG?

    Everus Construction Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 4.54%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Everus Construction Group's return on equity of 35.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    11.36% $0.67 $718.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $337.40, signalling upside risk potential of 26.18%. On the other hand Everus Construction Group has an analysts' consensus of $61.67 which suggests that it could grow by 58.2%. Given that Everus Construction Group has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Everus Construction Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    17 7 0
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    2 2 0
  • Is PWR or ECG More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everus Construction Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Everus Construction Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Everus Construction Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Everus Construction Group quarterly revenues of $759.6M. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Everus Construction Group's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.34x while Everus Construction Group's PE ratio is 13.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.69x versus 0.70x for Everus Construction Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.69x 44.34x $6.6B $305.1M
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    0.70x 13.12x $759.6M $34.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or EME?

    EMCOR Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 7.75%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    20.08% $6.32 $2.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $337.40, signalling upside risk potential of 26.18%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $499.80 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    17 7 0
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    4 1 0
  • Is PWR or EME More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.558%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than EMCOR Group's net income of $292.2M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.34x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.69x versus 1.27x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.69x 44.34x $6.6B $305.1M
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    1.27x 18.34x $3.8B $292.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or FAST?

    Fastenal has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 14.37%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    FAST
    Fastenal
    44.85% $0.46 $3.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $337.40, signalling upside risk potential of 26.18%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.63 which suggests that it could fall by -0.57%. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Fastenal.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    17 7 0
    FAST
    Fastenal
    3 11 3
  • Is PWR or FAST More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.34x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.69x versus 5.79x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.69x 44.34x $6.6B $305.1M
    FAST
    Fastenal
    5.79x 37.85x $1.8B $262.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or IESC?

    IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 7.51%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    23.75% $2.72 $692.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $337.40, signalling upside risk potential of 26.18%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than IES Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    17 7 0
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PWR or IESC More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.273%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.34x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 17.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.69x versus 1.26x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.69x 44.34x $6.6B $305.1M
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    1.26x 17.34x $749.5M $56.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or SVLT?

    Sunvault Energy has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of --. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Sunvault Energy's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $337.40, signalling upside risk potential of 26.18%. On the other hand Sunvault Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    17 7 0
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is PWR or SVLT More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunvault Energy has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.14%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Sunvault Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunvault Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues of --. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Sunvault Energy's net income of --. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.34x while Sunvault Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.69x versus 0.17x for Sunvault Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.69x 44.34x $6.6B $305.1M
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    0.17x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is CyberArk The Next Big Cybersecurity Stock?
Is CyberArk The Next Big Cybersecurity Stock?

CyberArk Software (NASDAQ: CYBR) recently reported phenomenal quarter numbers, passing…

Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
Is the Market Going to Go Lower?

The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…

2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession

While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Mar 18

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 73.51% over the past day.

Buy
63
EXOD alert for Mar 18

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 3.96% over the past day.

Sell
45
MNPR alert for Mar 18

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is up 0.93% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock