FAST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 15.25% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 6.22%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling downside risk potential of -5.86%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $485.40 which suggests that it could grow by 2.76%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.749%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Fastenal's net income of $298.7M is higher than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.79x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 20.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.04x versus 1.46x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 15.25% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 9.24%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling downside risk potential of -5.86%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $500.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.62%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.884%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fastenal's net income of $298.7M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.79x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 27.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.04x versus 2.27x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 15.25% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 8.47%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 38.3%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling downside risk potential of -5.86%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.7%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $834M. Fastenal's net income of $298.7M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.79x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.04x versus 1.77x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otis Worldwide has a net margin of 15.25% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 7.25%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling downside risk potential of -5.86%. On the other hand Otis Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $100.93 which suggests that it could grow by 4.06%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.756%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Otis Worldwide offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide pays out 36.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Fastenal's net income of $298.7M is higher than Otis Worldwide's net income of $243M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.79x while Otis Worldwide's PE ratio is 25.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 6.04x versus 2.75x for Otis Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.