SVLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sunvault Energy's net margin of 7.31%. Sunvault Energy's return on equity of -- beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.99%.

Sunvault Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.48%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.44%.

Sunvault Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sunvault Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.16% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Sunvault Energy's net income of -- is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $270.3M. Notably, Sunvault Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 24.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunvault Energy is 0.28x versus 1.58x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fastenal has a net margin of -- compared to Sunvault Energy's net margin of 15.61%. Sunvault Energy's return on equity of -- beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Sunvault Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

Sunvault Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Sunvault Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Sunvault Energy's net income of -- is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Sunvault Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fastenal's PE ratio is 36.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunvault Energy is 0.28x versus 5.60x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sunvault Energy's net margin of 8.14%. Sunvault Energy's return on equity of -- beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Sunvault Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunvault Energy has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Sunvault Energy is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Sunvault Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunvault Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Sunvault Energy's net income of -- is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Sunvault Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunvault Energy is 0.28x versus 1.56x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services has a net margin of -- compared to Sunvault Energy's net margin of 4.52%. Sunvault Energy's return on equity of -- beat Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54%.

Sunvault Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quanta Services has an analysts' consensus of $329.62 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.178%.

Sunvault Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Sunvault Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quanta Services quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Sunvault Energy's net income of -- is lower than Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M. Notably, Sunvault Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanta Services's PE ratio is 57.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunvault Energy is 0.28x versus 2.04x for Quanta Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.