PCG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Edison International has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 11.09%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Edison International's return on equity of 8.47%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.61, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Edison International has an analysts' consensus of $89.01 which suggests that it could grow by 28.07%. Given that Edison International has higher upside potential than PG&E, analysts believe Edison International is more attractive than PG&E.

PG&E has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edison International has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.376%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Edison International offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International pays out 86.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Edison International quarterly revenues of $5.2B. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Edison International's net income of $577M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Edison International's PE ratio is 20.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.66x versus 1.55x for Edison International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evergy has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 25.7%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Evergy's return on equity of 8.72%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.61, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Evergy has an analysts' consensus of $65.41 which suggests that it could grow by 7.38%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Evergy, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Evergy.

PG&E has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergy has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.387%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Evergy offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy pays out 77.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Evergy quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Evergy's net income of $465.6M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Evergy's PE ratio is 16.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.66x versus 2.43x for Evergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 25.29%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Otter Tail's return on equity of 20.19%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.61, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Otter Tail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.78%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Otter Tail, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Otter Tail.

PG&E has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.978%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Otter Tail offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Otter Tail quarterly revenues of $338M. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Otter Tail's net income of $85.5M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Otter Tail's PE ratio is 10.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.66x versus 2.33x for Otter Tail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 18.72%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.61, signalling upside risk potential of 21.71%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $71.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PG&E has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.9%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PG&E's net income of $579M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.66x versus 2.69x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.