PPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dominion Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 15.85%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Dominion Energy's return on equity of 7.33%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.27%. On the other hand Dominion Energy has an analysts' consensus of $59.18 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Dominion Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Dominion Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dominion Energy has a beta of 0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.369%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Dominion Energy offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Dominion Energy pays out 105.41% of its earnings as a dividend. PPL's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dominion Energy's is not.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dominion Energy quarterly revenues of $4.1B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Dominion Energy's net income of $646M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.83x while Dominion Energy's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 3.05x for Dominion Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duke Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 16.72%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.27%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.64 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.548%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.83x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 18.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 2.81x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 17.16%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Southern's return on equity of 12.62%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.27%. On the other hand Southern has an analysts' consensus of $91.73 which suggests that it could grow by 8.03%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Southern, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Southern.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.482%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Southern offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern pays out 67.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Southern quarterly revenues of $7.8B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Southern's net income of $1.3B. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.83x while Southern's PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 3.36x for Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 12.37%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.22%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 12.27%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $75.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.418%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.9B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $483M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.83x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.87x versus 2.84x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.