HP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess has a net margin of 8.09% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 16.97%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63% beat Hess's return on equity of 25.2%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.47%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $167.57 which suggests that it could grow by 21.46%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Hess.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.45500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.287%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Hess offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $677.3M, which are smaller than Hess quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M is lower than Hess's net income of $542M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.21x while Hess's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.78x versus 3.30x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 8.09% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 16.73%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.47%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.45500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $677.3M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.21x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.78x versus 3.86x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 8.09% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 10.42%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.6%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.47%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $35.91 which suggests that it could grow by 69.38%. Given that Noble Corp PLC has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Noble Corp PLC is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.45500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 8.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $677.3M, which are smaller than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $927.3M. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $96.6M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.21x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 7.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.78x versus 1.05x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 8.09% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -4.44%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $32.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.47%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 60.06%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.45500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.906%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.17%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $677.3M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.21x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.78x versus 0.49x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.