BATL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 0.16%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 5.83% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1034.15%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.93%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.358%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $47.5M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $1B. Battalion Oil's net income of $6M is higher than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 8.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.14x versus 0.59x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 12.39%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 5.83% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.53%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1034.15%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $32.82 which suggests that it could grow by 12.74%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Noble Corp PLC, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Noble Corp PLC.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $47.5M, which are smaller than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $874.5M. Battalion Oil's net income of $6M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 9.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.14x versus 1.38x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 0.08%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 5.83% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1034.15%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 29.35%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.818%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $47.5M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Battalion Oil's net income of $6M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.14x versus 0.50x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of -4.18%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 5.83% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 12.63%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1034.15%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $41.86 which suggests that it could grow by 43.54%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Seadrill, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Seadrill.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $47.5M, which are smaller than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $335M. Battalion Oil's net income of $6M is higher than Seadrill's net income of -$14M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seadrill's PE ratio is 5.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.14x versus 1.47x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.