HES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess Midstream LP has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Hess's net margin of 18.79%. Hess's return on equity of 19.29% beat Hess Midstream LP's return on equity of 56.73%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $159.26, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Hess Midstream LP has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.2%. Given that Hess has higher upside potential than Hess Midstream LP, analysts believe Hess is more attractive than Hess Midstream LP.

Hess has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess Midstream LP has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.928%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Hess Midstream LP offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess Midstream LP pays out 105.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hess Midstream LP's is not.

Hess quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Hess Midstream LP quarterly revenues of $381M. Hess's net income of $430M is higher than Hess Midstream LP's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Hess Midstream LP's PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.51x versus 2.55x for Hess Midstream LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Hess's net margin of 16.91%. Hess's return on equity of 19.29% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $159.26, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.31%. Given that Hess has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Hess is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Hess has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.63%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Hess's net income of $430M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.51x versus 3.96x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Hess's net margin of 0.08%. Hess's return on equity of 19.29% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $159.26, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 29.35%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Hess.

Hess has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.818%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Hess's net income of $430M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.51x versus 0.50x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 14.77% compared to Hess's net margin of 9.52%. Hess's return on equity of 19.29% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $159.26, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 10.28%. Given that Hess has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Hess is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Hess has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.672%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Hess's net income of $430M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.51x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.