HES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess Midstream LP has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Hess's net margin of 17.82%. Hess's return on equity of 25.2% beat Hess Midstream LP's return on equity of 54.29%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.44%. On the other hand Hess Midstream LP has an analysts' consensus of $44.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Hess has higher upside potential than Hess Midstream LP, analysts believe Hess is more attractive than Hess Midstream LP.

Hess has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.287% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess Midstream LP has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.966%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Hess Midstream LP offers a yield of 7.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess Midstream LP pays out 105.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hess Midstream LP's is not.

Hess quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Hess Midstream LP quarterly revenues of $395M. Hess's net income of $542M is higher than Hess Midstream LP's net income of $70.4M. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Hess Midstream LP's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.07x versus 2.13x for Hess Midstream LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Hess's net margin of -4.44%. Hess's return on equity of 25.2% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.44%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 82.29%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Hess.

Hess has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.287% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.906%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hess's net income of $542M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.07x versus 0.43x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Hess's net margin of 11.8%. Hess's return on equity of 25.2% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.44%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $51.81 which suggests that it could grow by 52.57%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Hess.

Hess has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.287% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Hess's net income of $542M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.07x versus 1.34x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Hess's net margin of 9.39%. Hess's return on equity of 25.2% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Hess has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.44%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $126.48 which suggests that it could grow by 22.78%. Given that Hess has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Hess is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Hess has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.287% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Hess has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Hess pays 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hess quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Hess's net income of $542M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Hess's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hess is 3.07x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.