CSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of 24.7% compared to CSX's net margin of 2.09%. CSX's return on equity of 29.55% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 23.46%.

CSX has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $116.61 which suggests that it could grow by 12.58%. Given that CSX has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe CSX is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

CSX has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.935%.

CSX has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. CSX pays 23.74% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 89.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CSX quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4.6B. CSX's net income of $894M is higher than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $97.2M. Notably, CSX's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 35.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CSX is 4.36x versus 0.70x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norfolk Southern has a net margin of 24.7% compared to CSX's net margin of 36.02%. CSX's return on equity of 29.55% beat Norfolk Southern's return on equity of 18.67%.

CSX has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand Norfolk Southern has an analysts' consensus of $272.92 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that CSX has higher upside potential than Norfolk Southern, analysts believe CSX is more attractive than Norfolk Southern.

CSX has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norfolk Southern has a beta of 1.342, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.174%.

CSX has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Norfolk Southern offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. CSX pays 23.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Norfolk Southern pays out 67.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CSX quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Norfolk Southern quarterly revenues of $3.1B. CSX's net income of $894M is lower than Norfolk Southern's net income of $1.1B. Notably, CSX's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Norfolk Southern's PE ratio is 23.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CSX is 4.36x versus 4.56x for Norfolk Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Union Pacific has a net margin of 24.7% compared to CSX's net margin of 27.43%. CSX's return on equity of 29.55% beat Union Pacific's return on equity of 42.8%.

CSX has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand Union Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $256.65 which suggests that it could grow by 9.56%. Given that CSX has higher upside potential than Union Pacific, analysts believe CSX is more attractive than Union Pacific.

CSX has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Union Pacific has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.728%.

CSX has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Union Pacific offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. CSX pays 23.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Union Pacific pays out 49.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CSX quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Union Pacific quarterly revenues of $6.1B. CSX's net income of $894M is lower than Union Pacific's net income of $1.7B. Notably, CSX's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Union Pacific's PE ratio is 21.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CSX is 4.36x versus 5.88x for Union Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USD Partners LP has a net margin of 24.7% compared to CSX's net margin of --. CSX's return on equity of 29.55% beat USD Partners LP's return on equity of --.

CSX has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand USD Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8144.02%. Given that USD Partners LP has higher upside potential than CSX, analysts believe USD Partners LP is more attractive than CSX.

CSX has a beta of 1.223, which suggesting that the stock is 22.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USD Partners LP has a beta of 1.146, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.602%.

CSX has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. USD Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CSX pays 23.74% of its earnings as a dividend. USD Partners LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CSX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CSX quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than USD Partners LP quarterly revenues of --. CSX's net income of $894M is higher than USD Partners LP's net income of --. Notably, CSX's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while USD Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CSX is 4.36x versus 0.02x for USD Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.