AEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Entergy has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 10.47%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Entergy's return on equity of 7.14%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.56, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $88.26 which suggests that it could grow by 4.56%. Given that Entergy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Entergy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.863%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than Entergy's net income of $287.2M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Entergy's PE ratio is 34.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.50x versus 3.07x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 22.34%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.64%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.56, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $84.51 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.762%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 20.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.50x versus 5.86x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 16.8%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.56, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $259.67 which suggests that it could grow by 31.49%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Ameren's net income of $207M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.50x versus 5.28x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 10.92%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.56, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $171.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.64%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.355%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Vistra's PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.50x versus 2.42x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.