Financhill
Buy
53

CMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$73.27
Seasonality move :
2.31%
Day range:
$72.05 - $73.52
52-week range:
$56.61 - $75.06
Dividend yield:
2.9%
P/E ratio:
21.70x
P/S ratio:
2.86x
P/B ratio:
2.69x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
2.4M
1-year change:
25.85%
Market cap:
$21.5B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$3.32

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CMS
CMS Energy
$2.1B $0.87 7.06% 13.83% $73.74
AEE
Ameren
$1.9B $0.78 8.35% 9.51% $100.56
CNP
CenterPoint Energy
$2.5B $0.40 4.31% -0.55% $34.31
DTE
DTE Energy
$3.2B $1.44 2.8% 31.09% $138.65
NEE
NextEra Energy
$7.9B $0.53 14.78% -17.64% $84.51
TLN
Talen Energy
$433.9M -$0.20 34.85% -82.7% $261.98
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CMS
CMS Energy
$72.04 $73.74 $21.5B 21.70x $0.54 2.9% 2.86x
AEE
Ameren
$98.88 $100.56 $26.7B 22.37x $0.71 2.75% 3.47x
CNP
CenterPoint Energy
$35.23 $34.31 $23B 22.16x $0.22 2.36% 2.63x
DTE
DTE Energy
$134.50 $138.65 $27.9B 19.87x $1.09 3.14% 2.24x
NEE
NextEra Energy
$68.59 $84.51 $141.1B 20.35x $0.57 3.08% 5.71x
TLN
Talen Energy
$217.73 $261.98 $9.9B 19.32x $0.00 0% 5.82x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CMS
CMS Energy
66.66% 0.084 79.66% 0.33x
AEE
Ameren
60.72% 0.498 77.4% 0.29x
CNP
CenterPoint Energy
66.28% 0.672 102.06% 0.48x
DTE
DTE Energy
66.32% 0.244 92.97% 0.36x
NEE
NextEra Energy
62.17% 1.037 52.03% 0.25x
TLN
Talen Energy
68.41% 2.146 32.44% 0.99x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CMS
CMS Energy
$877M $425M 4.11% 11.78% 24.43% -$550M
AEE
Ameren
$794M $198M 4.01% 10.03% 16.59% -$507M
CNP
CenterPoint Energy
$976M $483M 3.42% 9.95% 22.19% -$1.1B
DTE
DTE Energy
$1.2B $670M 4.13% 12.39% 16.59% -$163M
NEE
NextEra Energy
$3B $907M 4.97% 11.64% 5.92% $139M
TLN
Talen Energy
$152M $13M 12.83% 29.37% 5.12% $99M

CMS Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CMS or AEE?

    Ameren has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 10.67%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat Ameren's return on equity of 10.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    44.09% $0.87 $25.2B
    AEE
    Ameren
    40.91% $0.77 $31B
  • What do Analysts Say About CMS or AEE?

    CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand Ameren has an analysts' consensus of $100.56 which suggests that it could grow by 1.69%. Given that CMS Energy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than Ameren.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    6 8 0
    AEE
    Ameren
    7 7 0
  • Is CMS or AEE More Risky?

    CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ameren has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.041%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMS or AEE?

    CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Ameren offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Ameren pays out 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CMS or AEE?

    CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ameren quarterly revenues of $1.9B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than Ameren's net income of $207M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.70x while Ameren's PE ratio is 22.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.86x versus 3.47x for Ameren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    2.86x 21.70x $2B $265M
    AEE
    Ameren
    3.47x 22.37x $1.9B $207M
  • Which has Higher Returns CMS or CNP?

    CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 10.96%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    44.09% $0.87 $25.2B
    CNP
    CenterPoint Energy
    43.15% $0.38 $31.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CMS or CNP?

    CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $34.31 which suggests that it could fall by -2.61%. Given that CMS Energy has higher upside potential than CenterPoint Energy, analysts believe CMS Energy is more attractive than CenterPoint Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    6 8 0
    CNP
    CenterPoint Energy
    4 11 0
  • Is CMS or CNP More Risky?

    CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.631%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMS or CNP?

    CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CMS or CNP?

    CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.3B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $248M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.70x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.86x versus 2.63x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    2.86x 21.70x $2B $265M
    CNP
    CenterPoint Energy
    2.63x 22.16x $2.3B $248M
  • Which has Higher Returns CMS or DTE?

    DTE Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 8.5%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat DTE Energy's return on equity of 12.39%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    44.09% $0.87 $25.2B
    DTE
    DTE Energy
    33.5% $1.41 $34.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CMS or DTE?

    CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand DTE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $138.65 which suggests that it could grow by 3.09%. Given that DTE Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe DTE Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    6 8 0
    DTE
    DTE Energy
    9 8 0
  • Is CMS or DTE More Risky?

    CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.74%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMS or DTE?

    CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. DTE Energy offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 57.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CMS or DTE?

    CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than DTE Energy quarterly revenues of $3.4B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than DTE Energy's net income of $292M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.70x while DTE Energy's PE ratio is 19.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.86x versus 2.24x for DTE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    2.86x 21.70x $2B $265M
    DTE
    DTE Energy
    2.24x 19.87x $3.4B $292M
  • Which has Higher Returns CMS or NEE?

    NextEra Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 22.34%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    44.09% $0.87 $25.2B
    NEE
    NextEra Energy
    55.28% $0.58 $143.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CMS or NEE?

    CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $84.51 which suggests that it could grow by 23.21%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    6 8 0
    NEE
    NextEra Energy
    8 8 1
  • Is CMS or NEE More Risky?

    CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.762%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMS or NEE?

    CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CMS or NEE?

    CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.70x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.86x versus 5.71x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    2.86x 21.70x $2B $265M
    NEE
    NextEra Energy
    5.71x 20.35x $5.4B $1.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns CMS or TLN?

    Talen Energy has a net margin of 13.32% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 16.8%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.78% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    44.09% $0.87 $25.2B
    TLN
    Talen Energy
    31.15% $1.81 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CMS or TLN?

    CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $73.74, signalling upside risk potential of 2.36%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $261.98 which suggests that it could grow by 20.32%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    6 8 0
    TLN
    Talen Energy
    9 0 0
  • Is CMS or TLN More Risky?

    CMS Energy has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.07% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMS or TLN?

    CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CMS Energy pays 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMS Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CMS or TLN?

    CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. CMS Energy's net income of $265M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.70x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 19.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.86x versus 5.82x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CMS
    CMS Energy
    2.86x 21.70x $2B $265M
    TLN
    Talen Energy
    5.82x 19.32x $488M $82M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Diamondback Energy a Good Stock to Buy?
Is Diamondback Energy a Good Stock to Buy?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) is a lesser-known diamond in the rough…

What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?
What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?

You’ve probably heard the expression “hindsight is 20/20.” That saying…

Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?
Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) had an initial IPO of close to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
29
UNF alert for Mar 26

UniFirst [UNF] is up 0.24% over the past day.

Sell
30
KEQU alert for Mar 26

Kewaunee Scientific [KEQU] is down 1.45% over the past day.

Buy
82
EPAC alert for Mar 27

Enerpac Tool Group [EPAC] is down 3.19% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock