VST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 1.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.22%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $292.76 which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Constellation Energy's net income of $118M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.97x while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 30.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.81x versus 3.71x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duke Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 16.72%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.22%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.46 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Duke Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Duke Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.548%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.97x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.81x versus 2.90x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 9.43%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.22%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $117.10 which suggests that it could fall by -22.25%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.471%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than NRG Energy's net income of $643M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.97x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 30.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.81x versus 1.13x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 16.8%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.94, signalling upside risk potential of 12.22%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $256.90 which suggests that it could grow by 8.67%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.97x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 21.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.81x versus 6.33x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.