SWRAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71%.

Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.

Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.

Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 4.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.26x versus 0.59x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of 10.91%. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.

Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Highway Holdings.

Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.546%.

Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.26x versus 1.12x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.

Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.26x versus 1.74x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01%.

Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.

Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.706% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.26x versus 10.09x for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.