Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
33
WLGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.61
Seasonality move
:
-18.31%
Day range:
$1.76 - $1.90
52-week range:
$0.44 - $5.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
98.50x
P/S ratio:
3.61x
P/B ratio:
0.00x
Volume:
207.2K
Avg. volume:
138.2K
1-year change:
182.69%
Market cap:
$27.8M
Revenue:
$6.8M
EPS (TTM):
$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.84 | -- | $27.8M | 98.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.61x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.72 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 36.80x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.43 | -- | $11M | 4.86x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.64x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.96 | -- | $8.6M | -- | $0.05 | 6.12% | 1.14x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.87 | -- | $15.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.69 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
0.03% | 1.899 | 22.6% | 1.76x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -0.035 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.152 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
2.59% | -1.022 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.01% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
WANG & LEE Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01% beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or CHNR More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.50x while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is 3.61x versus 36.80x for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources36.80x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or CLWT More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.50x while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 4.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is 3.61x versus 0.64x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of 10.91%. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or HIHO More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.546%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.50x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is 3.61x versus 1.14x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.14x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or ILAG More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.50x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is 3.61x versus 1.75x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01% beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or ROMA More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.50x while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is 3.61x versus 8.65x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance8.65x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 10.89% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is down 3.89% over the past day.
