Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…
Sell
15
ROMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.70
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$0.66 - $0.73
52-week range:
$0.40 - $11.80
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
8.40x
P/B ratio:
1.37x
Volume:
36.8K
Avg. volume:
49.8K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$10.4M
Revenue:
$1.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.67 | -- | $10.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.40x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.67 | -- | $6.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 34.41x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.43 | -- | $11M | 4.86x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.64x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.97 | -- | $8.7M | -- | $0.05 | 6.09% | 1.15x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.89 | -- | $16.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.79x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.55 | -- | $23.4M | 98.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.04x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 6.29x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -0.035 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.152 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
2.59% | -1.022 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
0.03% | 1.899 | 22.6% | 1.76x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.01% | -- | -- |
Roma Green Finance vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance's net margin of --. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86% beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or CHNR?
Roma Green Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe Roma Green Finance is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or CHNR More Risky?
Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or CHNR?
Roma Green Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or CHNR?
Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance is 8.40x versus 34.41x for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance8.40x -- -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources34.41x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance's net margin of --. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe Roma Green Finance is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or CLWT More Risky?
Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Roma Green Finance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 4.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance is 8.40x versus 0.64x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance8.40x -- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance's net margin of 10.91%. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe Roma Green Finance is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or HIHO More Risky?
Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.546%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Roma Green Finance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Roma Green Finance's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, Roma Green Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance is 8.40x versus 1.15x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance8.40x -- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.15x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance's net margin of --. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Roma Green Finance is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or ILAG More Risky?
Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance is 8.40x versus 1.79x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance8.40x -- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.79x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or WLGS?
WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance's net margin of --. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or WLGS?
Roma Green Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Roma Green Finance is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or WLGS More Risky?
Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or WLGS?
Roma Green Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or WLGS?
Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance is 8.40x versus 3.04x for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance8.40x -- -- -- WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.04x 98.50x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.
