Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
42
CLWT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.35
Seasonality move
:
26.84%
Day range:
$1.36 - $1.43
52-week range:
$1.28 - $1.94
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
4.86x
P/S ratio:
0.64x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
1.6K
Avg. volume:
8.8K
1-year change:
-7.14%
Market cap:
$11M
Revenue:
$17.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.43 | -- | $11M | 4.86x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.64x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.72 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 36.80x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.96 | -- | $8.6M | -- | $0.05 | 6.12% | 1.14x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.87 | -- | $15.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.69 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.65x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.84 | -- | $27.8M | 98.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -0.035 | -- | 1.59x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.152 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
2.59% | -1.022 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 6.29x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
0.03% | 1.899 | 22.6% | 1.76x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.01% | -- | -- |
Euro Tech Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71% beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or CHNR More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.86x while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.64x versus 36.80x for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources36.80x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of 10.91%. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or HIHO More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.546%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.86x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.64x versus 1.14x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.14x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ILAG More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.86x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.64x versus 1.75x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71% beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ROMA More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.86x while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.64x versus 8.65x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance8.65x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or WLGS?
WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or WLGS More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.86x while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.64x versus 3.61x for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.64x 4.86x -- -- WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.61x 98.50x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 10.89% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is down 3.89% over the past day.
