Financhill
Buy
62

SOIEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$25.95
Seasonality move :
2.48%
Day range:
$25.95 - $25.95
52-week range:
$24.61 - $49.08
Dividend yield:
10.6%
P/E ratio:
3.46x
P/S ratio:
0.48x
P/B ratio:
0.80x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
635
1-year change:
-23.68%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$2.8B
EPS (TTM):
$7.50

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SOIEF
Stolt-Nielsen
$708.7M -- -0.47% -- --
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
$55.6M $0.39 -45.09% -36.51% $18.60
KEX
Kirby
$803.7M $1.29 0.56% 24.84% $137.17
MATX
Matson
$851.5M $3.19 7.94% 82.87% $150.50
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
$142.6M $0.16 8.14% 444.43% $9.82
SFL
SFL
$218.2M $0.16 5.63% -37.35% --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SOIEF
Stolt-Nielsen
$25.95 -- $1.7B 3.46x $1.25 10.6% 0.48x
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
$11.41 $18.60 $479.4M 3.20x $0.18 9.47% 1.14x
KEX
Kirby
$112.81 $137.17 $6.5B 21.65x $0.00 0% 2.03x
MATX
Matson
$138.49 $150.50 $4.6B 11.52x $0.34 0.95% 1.44x
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
$5.56 $9.82 $260.8M 11.83x $0.10 7.19% 0.49x
SFL
SFL
$10.55 -- $1.4B 9.50x $0.27 10.14% 1.54x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SOIEF
Stolt-Nielsen
46.71% -0.608 71.52% 0.80x
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
3.28% 0.330 2.82% 3.03x
KEX
Kirby
22.86% 1.201 13.87% 0.94x
MATX
Matson
13.53% 1.068 8.44% 1.04x
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
28.65% -0.374 34.99% 1.54x
SFL
SFL
69.52% 0.772 167.76% 0.29x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SOIEF
Stolt-Nielsen
$185M $112.5M 10.44% 20.03% 19.5% $142.5M
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
$36.9M $26.3M 23.62% 25.08% 26.57% $38.6M
KEX
Kirby
$218.4M $125.3M 7.55% 9.47% 15.63% $130.1M
MATX
Matson
$307.7M $235.4M 14.45% 16.95% 26.47% $188.3M
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
$21M $15M 4.49% 5.74% 7.03% -$20.1M
SFL
SFL
$97M $94.1M 4.27% 13.36% 38.52% -$225.1M

Stolt-Nielsen vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SOIEF or ASC?

    Ardmore Shipping has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 25.12%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Ardmore Shipping's return on equity of 25.08%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    25.25% $1.85 $4.1B
    ASC
    Ardmore Shipping
    38.4% $0.55 $686.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About SOIEF or ASC?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ardmore Shipping has an analysts' consensus of $18.60 which suggests that it could grow by 63.02%. Given that Ardmore Shipping has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Ardmore Shipping is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0 0 0
    ASC
    Ardmore Shipping
    3 2 0
  • Is SOIEF or ASC More Risky?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ardmore Shipping has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.664%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOIEF or ASC?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.6%. Ardmore Shipping offers a yield of 9.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Ardmore Shipping pays out 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SOIEF or ASC?

    Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are larger than Ardmore Shipping quarterly revenues of $96.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than Ardmore Shipping's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Ardmore Shipping's PE ratio is 3.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.14x for Ardmore Shipping. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0.48x 3.46x $732.8M $99.2M
    ASC
    Ardmore Shipping
    1.14x 3.20x $96.1M $24.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SOIEF or KEX?

    Kirby has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 10.83%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    25.25% $1.85 $4.1B
    KEX
    Kirby
    26.28% $1.55 $4.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About SOIEF or KEX?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $137.17 which suggests that it could grow by 21.59%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0 0 0
    KEX
    Kirby
    6 0 0
  • Is SOIEF or KEX More Risky?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.812%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOIEF or KEX?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.6%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SOIEF or KEX?

    Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Kirby's PE ratio is 21.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 2.03x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0.48x 3.46x $732.8M $99.2M
    KEX
    Kirby
    2.03x 21.65x $831.1M $90M
  • Which has Higher Returns SOIEF or MATX?

    Matson has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 20.7%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    25.25% $1.85 $4.1B
    MATX
    Matson
    31.99% $5.89 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About SOIEF or MATX?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could fall by -19.61%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0 0 0
    MATX
    Matson
    2 1 0
  • Is SOIEF or MATX More Risky?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.595%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOIEF or MATX?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.6%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SOIEF or MATX?

    Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.44x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0.48x 3.46x $732.8M $99.2M
    MATX
    Matson
    1.44x 11.52x $962M $199.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SOIEF or PANL?

    Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 3.34%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    25.25% $1.85 $4.1B
    PANL
    Pangaea Logistics Solutions
    13.74% $0.11 $512.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About SOIEF or PANL?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.82 which suggests that it could grow by 76.56%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0 0 0
    PANL
    Pangaea Logistics Solutions
    3 0 0
  • Is SOIEF or PANL More Risky?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.528%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOIEF or PANL?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.6%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SOIEF or PANL?

    Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 0.49x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0.48x 3.46x $732.8M $99.2M
    PANL
    Pangaea Logistics Solutions
    0.49x 11.83x $153.1M $5.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SOIEF or SFL?

    SFL has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 17.58%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat SFL's return on equity of 13.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    25.25% $1.85 $4.1B
    SFL
    SFL
    38.3% $0.34 $3.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About SOIEF or SFL?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.75%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0 0 0
    SFL
    SFL
    0 0 0
  • Is SOIEF or SFL More Risky?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.419%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SOIEF or SFL?

    Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.6%. SFL offers a yield of 10.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SOIEF or SFL?

    Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are larger than SFL quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than SFL's net income of $44.5M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while SFL's PE ratio is 9.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.54x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SOIEF
    Stolt-Nielsen
    0.48x 3.46x $732.8M $99.2M
    SFL
    SFL
    1.54x 9.50x $253.2M $44.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Philip Morris Stock Overvalued?
Is Philip Morris Stock Overvalued?

If there is one industry that can be termed truly…

What Quantum Stocks Should I Buy?
What Quantum Stocks Should I Buy?

The last several years have seen a series of tech…

Will Sirius XM Be a 10-Bagger Stock?
Will Sirius XM Be a 10-Bagger Stock?

Last year, Warren Buffett surprised practically everyone when he acquired…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
32
FTAI alert for Jan 22

FTAI Aviation [FTAI] is up 1.34% over the past day.

Sell
2
EDU alert for Jan 22

New Oriental Education & Technology Group [EDU] is down 0.51% over the past day.

Buy
51
GH alert for Jan 22

Guardant Health [GH] is up 7.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock