PANL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hub Group has a net margin of -1.61% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 2.93%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.27%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 106.3%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Hub Group.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.054%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.89%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $122.8M, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M is lower than Hub Group's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.41x versus 0.53x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby has a net margin of -1.61% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 9.67%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.84%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 106.3%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $126.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.806%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.89%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $122.8M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $785.7M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M is lower than Kirby's net income of $76M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Kirby's PE ratio is 21.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.41x versus 1.98x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of -1.61% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 9.25%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67% beat Matson's return on equity of 20.32%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 106.3%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $142.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.27%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.847%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.89%. Matson offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $122.8M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $782M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M is lower than Matson's net income of $72.3M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Matson's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.41x versus 1.09x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of -1.61% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of -27.91%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 106.3%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 143.45%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.463% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.007%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.89%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $122.8M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.41x versus 0.56x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.