PANL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 10.83%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.82, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $137.17 which suggests that it could grow by 21.59%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.812%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.19%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is lower than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Kirby's PE ratio is 21.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.49x versus 2.03x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 20.7%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.82, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could fall by -19.61%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.595%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.19%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.49x versus 1.44x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 1.66%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.82, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.2%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.108%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.19%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $203.6M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 41.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.49x versus 0.43x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of -23.72%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of $9.82, signalling upside risk potential of 76.56%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.68%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.528% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.736%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.19%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $68.9M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.49x versus 0.69x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.