KEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matson has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 20.7%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.59%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could fall by -19.61%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Matson.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.595%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Kirby's net income of $90M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.65x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 2.03x versus 1.44x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 3.34%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.59%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.82 which suggests that it could grow by 76.56%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.528%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Kirby's net income of $90M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.65x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 2.03x versus 0.49x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of -23.72%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.59%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.68%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.736%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $68.9M. Kirby's net income of $90M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.65x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 2.03x versus 0.69x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of 10.83% compared to Kirby's net margin of 4.63%. Kirby's return on equity of 9.47% beat XPO's return on equity of 26.68%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $137.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.59%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $149.83 which suggests that it could grow by 8.33%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than XPO, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than XPO.

Kirby has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.812% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 2.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.529%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $831.1M, which are smaller than XPO quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Kirby's net income of $90M is lower than XPO's net income of $95M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.65x while XPO's PE ratio is 44.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 2.03x versus 2.04x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.