KEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Kirby's net margin of -16.73%. Kirby's return on equity of 8.84% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 4.96%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $126.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.32%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 50.81%. Given that Genco Shipping & Trading has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.623%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 9.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 88.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $785.7M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $71.3M. Kirby's net income of $76M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of -$11.9M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.93x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 12.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.98x versus 1.52x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Kirby's net margin of 9.25%. Kirby's return on equity of 8.84% beat Matson's return on equity of 20.32%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $126.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.32%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $142.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.51%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.847%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $785.7M, which are larger than Matson quarterly revenues of $782M. Kirby's net income of $76M is higher than Matson's net income of $72.3M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.93x while Matson's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.98x versus 1.07x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Kirby's net margin of -1.61%. Kirby's return on equity of 8.84% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $126.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.32%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.28 which suggests that it could grow by 106.3%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.463%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 8.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $785.7M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Kirby's net income of $76M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.93x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.98x versus 0.41x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Kirby's net margin of -27.91%. Kirby's return on equity of 8.84% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13%.

Kirby has a consensus price target of $126.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.32%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 149.52%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Kirby has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.007%.

Kirby has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kirby pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kirby quarterly revenues are $785.7M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Kirby's net income of $76M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Kirby's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.93x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kirby is 1.98x versus 0.55x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.