SMHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of -27.91% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 9.67%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.84%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 126.88%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $126.60 which suggests that it could grow by 11.7%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.149%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $55.5M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $785.7M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Kirby's net income of $76M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirby's PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 2.03x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of -27.91% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 9.25%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13% beat Matson's return on equity of 20.32%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 126.88%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $142.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.63%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.918%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $55.5M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $782M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Matson's net income of $72.3M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matson's PE ratio is 7.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 1.10x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of -27.91% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of -1.61%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 126.88%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.28 which suggests that it could grow by 105.38%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.535%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $55.5M, which are smaller than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 0.41x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -27.91% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 1.19%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 126.88%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 54.98%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.292%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $55.5M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 17.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.