KTWIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Kurita Water Industries's net margin of -1471.96%. Kurita Water Industries's return on equity of 9.22% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Kurita Water Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kurita Water Industries has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Kurita Water Industries is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Kurita Water Industries has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.113% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Kurita Water Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kurita Water Industries pays 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kurita Water Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kurita Water Industries quarterly revenues are $602.9M, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Kurita Water Industries's net income of $36.6M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Kurita Water Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.91x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kurita Water Industries is 1.60x versus 12.15x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kubota has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Kurita Water Industries's net margin of 6.75%. Kurita Water Industries's return on equity of 9.22% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Kurita Water Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.55%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Kurita Water Industries, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Kurita Water Industries.

Kurita Water Industries has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.113% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.175%.

Kurita Water Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Kurita Water Industries pays 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kurita Water Industries quarterly revenues are $602.9M, which are smaller than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Kurita Water Industries's net income of $36.6M is lower than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Kurita Water Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.91x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kurita Water Industries is 1.60x versus 0.68x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Kurita Water Industries's net margin of 7.38%. Kurita Water Industries's return on equity of 9.22% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

Kurita Water Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.05 which suggests that it could grow by 6.66%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Kurita Water Industries, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Kurita Water Industries.

Kurita Water Industries has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.113% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.817%.

Kurita Water Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kurita Water Industries pays 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kurita Water Industries quarterly revenues are $602.9M, which are smaller than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Kurita Water Industries's net income of $36.6M is lower than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, Kurita Water Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.91x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kurita Water Industries is 1.60x versus 1.07x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 6.07% compared to Kurita Water Industries's net margin of 5.34%. Kurita Water Industries's return on equity of 9.22% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Kurita Water Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.69%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Kurita Water Industries, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Kurita Water Industries.

Kurita Water Industries has a beta of 0.709, which suggesting that the stock is 29.113% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kurita Water Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kurita Water Industries pays 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kurita Water Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kurita Water Industries quarterly revenues are $602.9M, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Kurita Water Industries's net income of $36.6M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Kurita Water Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.91x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kurita Water Industries is 1.60x versus 2.32x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.